Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease

Posted on 13.10.2021 - 12:09
Objectives:

To quantify the presence of conflicts of interest (COI) in SRs and MAs of Ménières disease treatment and identify any related secondary characteristics of these articles.

Methods:

A search was conducted on May 28, 2020 to search MEDLINE and Embase databases for SRs or MAs pertaining to Ménières disease published between September 1, 2016 and June 2, 2020. A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment criteria.

Results:

A total of 13 systematic reviews conducted by 49 authors met the inclusion criteria. Of the 49 authors, 7 (14.3%) were found to have some form of COI. Of these 7 authors, 1 (14.3%) completely disclosed all COI within the SR, 1 (14.3%) disclosed one or more COI but were found to have an additional undisclosed COI, and 5 (71.4%) were found to have only undisclosed COI. One of 2 industry funded SRs (50%) had a high risk of bias, and 1 (50%) of the non-industry sponsored SRs were found to have a high risk of bias.

Conclusions:

Overall authors of SRs pertaining to Ménières disease appear to be properly disclosing COI at higher rates than other fields of medicine; however, further room for improvement has been noted.

CITE THIS COLLECTION

Wenger, David; Nowlin, Ross; Johnson, Austin L.; Anderson, Michael; Weaver, Michael; Hartwell, Micah; et al. (2021): Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Regarding Ménières Disease. SAGE Journals. Collection. https://doi.org/10.25384/SAGE.c.5660188.v1
or
Select your citation style and then place your mouse over the citation text to select it.

SHARE

email

Usage metrics

Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology

AUTHORS (7)

David Wenger
Ross Nowlin
Austin L. Johnson
Michael Anderson
Michael Weaver
Micah Hartwell
Matt Vassar
need help?